By Dr. Kevin Lau
The QS World University Rankings 2027, released on 18 June, 2026, brought a cascade of good news for Hong Kong's higher education sector. Five of the city's universities held firm in the global top 100.
The University of Hong Kong placed 11th worldwide and second in Asia; the Chinese University of Hong Kong leapt 14 places in a single year to 18th, entering the global top 20 for the first time; the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology ranked 33rd; the Hong Kong Polytechnic University broke into the top 50 for the first time; and City University of Hong Kong came in at 52nd.
More gratifying still, not one of the seven Hong Kong institutions on the list saw its ranking fall, and Hong Kong was named Asia's most improved higher education system for the second consecutive year. This is, beyond doubt, an outstanding achievement—and the fruit of years of patient cultivation by every segment of our community.
Facts speak louder than words. Ben Sowter, Senior Vice President of QS, has described Hong Kong as one of the "most densely concentrated hubs" of elite higher education anywhere in the world. The Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2026, published in October 2025, confirmed the same trajectory: five Hong Kong universities entered the global top 100, and all eight universities funded by the University Grants Committee (UGC)—the statutory body that allocates public funding to the city's publicly funded institutions—appeared on the list, with every single one of them climbing. Hong Kong thereby became the only place in the world where every ranked institution improved its position. For a city of this size, such a record is no mean feat.
In my view, university rankings are not vanity trophies to be hung on a wall and admired; they are a concrete measure of a city's competitiveness, watched closely by students, parents, employers and investors the world over. Academic strength is the engine of the knowledge economy, and its contribution to Hong Kong's future manifests in at least four dimensions.
The first is the power to attract global talent. In the 2024/25 academic year, more than 17,000 non-local students were enrolled in publicly funded undergraduate programmes, equivalent to roughly 23 per cent of the local student intake. The Government, in its 2023 Policy Address, set out the goal of building Hong Kong into an "international post-secondary education hub". In 2024, it doubled the enrolment cap for non-local students from 20 to 40 per cent, and the 2025 Policy Address went further, announcing that from the 2026/27 academic year the ceiling will rise to 50 per cent, while the over-enrolment limit for research postgraduate programmes will be raised to 120 per cent.
A further HK$40 million was earmarked to help the eight UGC-funded universities promote themselves and recruit students, alongside the launch of the "Hostels in the City Scheme" to increase hostel places. In other words, Hong Kong is turning the "Study in Hong Kong" brand—the Government's campaign to market the city as a destination for international students — from a slogan into an industry.
The second dimension is the power to drive technological innovation. The University of Hong Kong is home to 53 researchers on Clarivate's list of "Highly Cited Researchers", the tenth-highest count of any institution in the world. In the World Intellectual Property Organization's Global Innovation Index 2025, the "Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou" innovation cluster ranked first globally for the first time. It is worth noting that when top-tier scholars and a top-tier cluster reinforce one another, the preconditions for a continuous wellspring of research output are in place.
The third dimension is the power to incubate high-growth start-ups. SenseTime, the artificial intelligence giant, originated in a Chinese University laboratory, while DJI's founder Frank Wang is a product of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology—ample proof that university laboratories, given the right soil, can hatch world-class enterprises with global reach.
The fourth is the industrial potential of education itself. Education services currently contribute only about 1.3 per cent of Hong Kong's GDP, far below the roughly 5.2 per cent in the United States and 6.0 per cent in the United Kingdom. The gap is precisely the room for growth: the industrialization of education has much to offer.
Looking ahead, I believe the Government and our universities must ride this momentum. They should sustain and increase investment in research, so as to consolidate the foundations of basic science. They should refine the supporting framework for "Study in Hong Kong", dismantling barriers and loosening restrictions on hostels, visas and employment pathways, so that talent can not only come but also stay.
They should accelerate the commercialization of university research, turning papers into patents and patents into companies. They should deepen academic cooperation within the Greater Bay Area—the Beijing-backed development zone linking Hong Kong, Macao and nine Guangdong cities—to amplify the innovation cluster effect. And they should build the education industry into a bigger and stronger pillar of the economy, benchmarking it against Britain and America. Only by grounding ourselves in knowledge and putting talent first can Hong Kong travel steadily and far.
Knowledge is hard currency; rankings are merely the exchange rate. The true value lies in what academic strength converts into for the city: talent, innovation and prosperity.
I firmly believe that as long as government, industry, academia and the research community pull together with one heart, Hong Kong—this "most densely concentrated hub"—will shine ever more brightly on the map of the global knowledge economy.
The author is the Founding Convenor of the Hong Kong Global Youth Professional Advocacy Action, a specialist in radiology, Master of Public Administration, Master of Public Health of the University of Hong Kong, and an adviser of the Our Hong Kong Foundation.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Kevin Lau:
Opinion | Medical Council reform: Balancing professional autonomy and public interest
Opinion | Targeted poverty alleviation: From assistance to social mobility
Comment