By Eunice Yung
Hong Kong's 2026–27 Budget stands as the city's most determined effort yet to position itself as a genuine global innovation and technology hub. Its approach is methodical, spanning robust support for industry transformation, a wider social push for "AI for all," and strategic investment in new frontiers such as advanced manufacturing, life sciences, and even the space industry. While implementation will inevitably rely on institutions like the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HKSTP), the ambitions now go far beyond any single organization.
A particularly welcome sign is the government's increasing clarity and confidence in the Northern Metropolis blueprint. The move to accelerate the development of the San Tin Technopole, with dedicated operational entities and substantial land allocations, is not just an infrastructure project but a powerful signal to local and international investors. Careful planning of the INNOPOLE, as approximately 20 hectares of purpose-built innovation land, is poised to help realize the Northern Metropolis as a true I&T city—not in name, but in concrete capability and international connectivity.
Underlying these hardware investments is a "software" revolution: specifically, the drive to mainstream artificial intelligence across sectors and generations. Establishing a Committee on AI+ and Industry Development Strategy marks, for the first time, an attempt to unify disparate public and private initiatives under a coherent strategy. This "AI for all" principle, underpinned by dedicated funding and territory-wide training, finally addresses a long-standing gap in Hong Kong's innovation journey. The presence of over 500 AI ventures and 5,000 professionals at HKSTP demonstrates that the talent base is already here; what will matter next is how access is broadened so that the benefits of AI—productivity, better jobs, smarter services—extend equally to all, regardless of age or industry.
This is especially vital if Hong Kong is to close the digital divide. The recent policy direction suggests a real willingness for inclusiveness—offering AI and digital literacy beyond specialist circles, into schools, workplaces, and community settings. It recognizes that tomorrow's most innovative breakthroughs may come from unlikely places, provided the right upskilling and enabling policies are in place. It is also a response to a global moment where societies are grappling with fears of technological redundancy and generational gaps in opportunity.
On the industrialization front, government actions to nurture high-growth enterprises are equally significant. The New Industrialization Elite Enterprises Nurturing Scheme and support for the city's first national manufacturing innovation centre outside the Mainland reflect a turn towards high-value-added, future-oriented industries. With more resources flowing to applied research, new materials, new energy, and microelectronics, Hong Kong is actively challenging its stereotype as a purely service or financial centre. There is now a real strategy for turning research into products, jobs, and exports—a transformation that will be further accelerated by leveraging the city's three InnoParks as R&D-to-market launchpads.
While Hong Kong has not traditionally been associated with space or aerospace technology, the government is now clearly signaling intent to carve out a role in this high-stakes sector. Initiatives to support emerging fields like embodied AI, quantum technology, and new materials are directly relevant to the evolving global space economy, where the boundaries between disciplines are falling away. By highlighting the space industry as a priority for research scale-up and commercialization, Hong Kong is taking steps to participate more actively in advanced science and technology at a global level.
This also fits neatly within the national agenda, enabling Hong Kong to serve as a bridge between China's burgeoning space ambitions and the international marketplace for space technology and services. Investment and talent policies supportive of aerospace innovation will further reinforce this positioning, attracting high-level enterprises and researchers to the region. The long-term impact, if sustained, will be to secure Hong Kong's place not only as a centre for financial and commercial activity, but as a site of high-quality, high-value contributions to the international space industry's value chain.
The focus on supporting biopharmaceutical R&D and establishing an International Clinical Trial Academy is, likewise, a sign of rising ambition to occupy a leading position in global health and science.
However, while resources and policy frameworks are necessary, they alone do not guarantee outcomes. It remains critical for Hong Kong to ensure that mechanisms for technology transfer, startup support, and venture funding are effective, responsive and transparent. The proposal for a HK$10 billion injection to accelerate the Hetao Hong Kong Park is a positive step, but it must translate into more than real estate: it must catalyze a vibrant, international startup ecosystem that encourages bold ideas and quick commercialization.
Ultimately, this Budget is about more than just numbers or flagship projects. It presents an invitation to rethink how Hong Kong fosters innovation—not only at the technical frontier, but in the daily lives and future careers of its people. The city's traditional strengths—rule of law, financial depth, and international outlook—will be as important as ever, but it is the successful "democratization" of new technology that will define the next chapter.
If Hong Kong can deliver on these promises, the result will not just be a more competitive and diversified economy, but also a society better equipped to thrive in the age of AI and beyond—where everyone, regardless of age or background, can share in new opportunities. In that sense, the 2026–27 Budget is both a blueprint and a challenge—to government, to industry, and above all, to the wider community.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Related News:
Opinion | Firm sentencing in national security trial affirms commitment to justice
Opinion | Panama's Supreme Court ruling sets dangerous precedent for international commerce
Comment