By Angelo Giuliano
Today we are thinking the unthinkable—really thinking the unthinkable—because the numbers on the screen are no longer behaving as expected. The Shanghai Gold Exchange has fixed physical spot silver between $79.10 and $79.35 per ounce, while the COMEX March futures contract settles at $72.82, creating a structural premium of more than six and a half dollars. This gap is not shrinking. It is not being arbitraged away in any meaningful sense. Instead, it sits there, day after day, quietly declaring that the old rules governing global silver pricing may no longer hold.
The Long-Standing Agreement That Is Starting to Unravel
For decades the precious metals community has operated under a simple, unspoken consensus: the silver price is whatever COMEX in New York declares on any given trading session. That clean, orderly figure flashes across terminals worldwide, and everyone—from jewelry workshops in Mumbai to electronics fabricators in Germany to retail investors in small American towns—accepts it as the universal reference point. The assumption has been that paper and physical would always converge, that arbitrage would keep the system aligned, and that Western exchanges would remain the gravitational center of price discovery. But what happens when that long-held agreement begins to feel less like an iron law and more like a habit slowly losing its authority?
A Gap That Refuses to Close
When a spread this wide—over six and a half dollars—emerges between the paper price in New York and the physical reality in Asia and then stubbornly refuses to narrow, we must ask whether we are still witnessing a familiar, temporary backwardation or something far more consequential. The arbitrage window has widened dramatically: first a dollar, then two, then five, now six and a half. Yet very little metal moves eastward from Western vaults. Why? Because the owners of real bars understand the outcome. Once those bars cross the Pacific, they disappear—absorbed into solar panel manufacturing lines, electric vehicle battery production, 5G infrastructure expansion, and growing strategic reserves. They do not return. The pattern repeats relentlessly, suggesting that real metal is choosing to stay home rather than chase a paper price that increasingly feels disconnected from supply and demand fundamentals.
A Colder, More Structural Reality
This moment is not a repeat of the loud, retail-driven squeezes of 2020–2021, when social media enthusiasm generated temporary chaos before the system reset. What is unfolding now is colder, more deliberate, and structurally rooted. China consumes approximately 55–60 percent of annual global silver production. BRICS central banks are accumulating gold at record levels and have begun to regard silver through a comparable strategic lens. Western vault inventories have been in persistent multi-year decline, with few institutions eager to subject those figures to close public scrutiny. The old belief—that regulators or major banks could summon hundreds of millions of ounces on demand whenever pressure mounted—has eroded to the point where it is no longer taken seriously without significant qualification.
Two Silvers, Two Worlds
Thinking the unthinkable leads to the conclusion that we may already be living with two distinct silvers. One exists in the digital realm of futures contracts, hedge fund books, ETFs, and bank ledgers—a high-volume, fast-moving version that still appears impressive on trading screens and continues to turn over billions of ounces daily. The other is the physical metal that is weighed on brass scales in Shanghai back rooms, transferred in Singapore warehouses, and delivered by truck to factories in Guangdong. This second silver pays no attention to what the COMEX ticker displayed at 8:15 a.m. New York time. It responds only to the question of what a buyer is prepared to pay, in real currency, for bars needed tomorrow.
The Slow Handover of Pricing Power
No official announcement is required. No press conference or headline is necessary. The transition can unfold gradually and almost politely: the arbitrage window remains tantalizingly open but never decisive, metal flows remain minimal, the premium stays elevated, and one morning the market wakes to realize, almost incidentally, that the center of gravity has shifted across the Pacific with no compelling reason to reverse course. If the Shanghai price continues to climb, if physical metal keeps moving eastward, if the gap becomes the new normal rather than an anomaly, how long can the market pretend that the lower, more comfortable Western number still defines the true value of silver?
The Story Writing Itself
The pages are turning eastward. The narrative is composing itself, whether or not the audience is prepared. If you hold physical silver, perhaps take an extra moment to consider those bars. They may already be speaking a language that the screens in New York no longer fully comprehend. The unthinkable is not arriving with explosions. It is arriving with the quiet, relentless mathematics of consumption, hoarding, and actual need.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Angelo Giuliano:
Opinion | Russia's strong reply: Did Europe make a big mistake?
Opinion | The true social credit experiment: Brussels, not Beijing
Opinion | Japan: America's permanent pawn – how a nation became the empire's reusable tool
Opinion | Venezuela's strategic posture: The architecture of asymmetric deterrence
Comment