By Angelo Giuliano
If you want to see how a superpower treats its "allies," you don't need to look at treaties or speeches. You just need to look at Japan. For nearly a century, the United States has turned Japan into the world's clearest example of a "geopolitical instrument"—a country that is built up, broken down, and remade to serve American interests. This is not a partnership between equals. It is a cycle of control. And as tensions rise with China, the U.S. is reaching for its most reliable tool once more.
The story starts with a familiar American playbook. Before World War II, powerful U.S. industrialists and bankers saw a rising Japan as a useful counterweight in Asia. They provided technology, investment, and strategic encouragement, helping to build Imperial Japan into a formidable regional power. Japan was America's unofficial forward base—an "advanced imperialist post," as some historians have called it—meant to project Western influence and check other rivals. But when Japan's own imperial ambitions eventually collided with American ones, the relationship turned. In the brutal Pacific War, the U.S. didn't just defeat Japan; it sought to annihilate its military capacity, firebomb its cities, and drop two atomic bombs to force unconditional surrender. The goal was not just victory, but total submission. By 1945, Japan was not merely beaten; it was completely broken and utterly under American control.
This is where the real plan began. With Japan prostrate, the U.S. moved from destroyer to rebuilder, but on one condition: absolute loyalty. The post-war occupation, led by General Douglas MacArthur, was a revolutionary project. The U.S. dismantled Japan's military, rewrote its pacifist constitution (Article 9), and reshaped its economy and politics to serve as a permanent, pliable ally. Japan was to be the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for American power in Asia—a perfect base to contain the Soviet Union and later, Communist China. Its economic "miracle" in the following decades was actively nurtured by the U.S., transforming the nation into a technological and industrial powerhouse. But this success came with invisible chains: Japan's foreign policy, its security, and its very sovereignty were, and remain, leased to Washington.
The Cold War cemented this master-tool relationship. Japan became the cornerstone of America's Asian defense strategy, hosting a massive concentration of U.S. troops and bases. In return for protection, Japan surrendered its right to an independent foreign policy. When the Soviet Union fell, many wondered if Japan's purpose had expired. But empires always find new uses for their tools. As China began its historic rise, American strategists dusted off the old playbook. The "China threat" became the new justification for keeping Japan on a tight leash—and for pressing it into a more confrontational role.
Today, we are watching the latest, most dangerous chapter of this cycle unfold. The U.S., seeking to maintain its dominance in Asia, is explicitly and aggressively using Japan as its primary military and political wedge against China. Japan is being pushed to dramatically increase its defense spending, acquire offensive strike capabilities (a move that stretches its pacifist constitution to the breaking point), and integrate fully into U.S.-led military alliances like the Quad. The goal is to position Japan on the front lines of a potential conflict, turning the East China Sea into a tripwire.
The most telling symbol of this enduring control sits in the Prime Minister's office. The current leader, Takaichi, is not merely a U.S. ally; she is a political product of this decades-long system. She hails from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the conservative powerhouse that has ruled Japan for most of the post-war era. And the origins of the LDP's power are not a mystery: they are rooted in one of the CIA's most successful and enduring covert operations. In the 1950s and 60s, the CIA funneled massive secret funds to support the LDP and suppress left-wing opposition, ensuring a government in Tokyo that would forever be aligned with Washington. To see a modern LDP Prime Minister now fervently executing a U.S.-scripted confrontation with China is to see the culmination of that 70-year investment. She is not a sovereign leader making free choices for her nation; she is a manager of an American asset.
This is the brutal, recurring logic of empire that Japan's history reveals. For the U.S. foreign policy establishment and its oligarchic backers, nations are not partners—they are assets. They are instruments to be deployed, used up, and recalibrated for the next task. The pattern is chillingly consistent:
- Build-Up: Elevate a nation as a useful counterweight.
- Breakdown: Crush it completely when it challenges your authority or its purpose shifts.
- Remake: Rebuild it entirely under your control, weaving its elites and institutions into your network.
- Reuse: Deploy it again as a controlled proxy in the next geopolitical contest.
Japan has now lived through all four stages, and is deep into the fourth. Its economy was leveraged to bankrupt the Soviet Union. Its territory hosts the keys to American military dominance in the Pacific. And now, its very society is being mobilized for a new cold war.
The final lesson from Japan's century as an American tool is a grim one for other nations watching from Europe to the Indo-Pacific. To the architects of the American empire, there are no permanent friends, only permanent interests. Alliances are not bonds of brotherhood; they are levers of control. A country can be an indispensable ally one day and a strategic rival the next. But for those brought into total submission, like Japan was, there is no "next." There is only a perpetual present of service. As the drums of a new conflict beat louder in Asia, Japan stands not as a warning of what might be, but as a living blueprint for what happens when a great power decides your sovereignty is a price worth paying for its own security. The tool, no matter how polished or powerful, never gets to choose when it is used—or when it might be discarded.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Angelo Giuliano:
Opinion | Venezuela's strategic posture: The architecture of asymmetric deterrence
Opinion | The looming threat: False flags and the pretext for war in Venezuela
Comment