Opinion | China needs to return to its strategy of promoting and defending free-trade
By Tom Fowdy
Yesterday, incoming US President Donald Trump announced on social media that he would be slapping tariffs on numerous countries on day one in office, including 25% on Mexico and Canada and 10% on China, which he stated would be in addition to any future tariffs. It is obvious that the White House will return to its strategy of weaponizing levies against Beijing to try and force China to make concessions by hurting its trade and supply chains.
Concerning Mexico and Canada, given their geographical and economic dependency on exports to the United States, we should expect the president to use this as quick leverage in order to force them to capitulate to American terms and conditions, as they did before with the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). While Trump has publicly stated immigration and drugs are part of the spat with Mexico, we should absolutely expect "Anti-China strings" attached to any new agreement they have made, especially concerning Chinese investments in the Electric Vehicle supply chain there. Mexico's President did, however, threaten their own retaliatory tariffs in such an instance.
On the other hand, we should anticipate that Canada will do whatever the US wants, as they have been anyway. Canada has effectively been robbed of all leverage and independence in its foreign policy-making by being in the extraordinary position of having burnt its bridges with China and India simultaneously, placing itself in a corner with the United States as its only option. Out of all the Anglosphere states, Ottawa has no engagement with Beijing whatsoever. This leaves them completely at Trump's mercy in the event of any trade conflict, and chances of directly re-engaging with China to balance things out seem remarkably slim.
As for China itself, Trump will again play extremely hardball. There will be tariffs, more tariffs, and the negotiation barriers to removing those tariffs will be very high. To his credit, at least he is willing to talk; the Biden administration was not. If it were not for COVID, Trump would have championed a new deal with Beijing and used it for his election campaign in 2020. The President is looking for a political "win," and he wants to be able to open up the Chinese market for American exports. He claims that he is a defender of jobs and manufacturing at home. If China is sensible about this, despite the ultra-hawks he has placed in his administration, they should see this as an opportunity as much as it is a challenge.
However, that also does not mean total capitulation. China should, of course, acquire its own leverage and be able to strategically outplay the Trump administration while seeking to avoid direct confrontation with him at all costs. The key is not only what is done with the US directly but also with other countries. After all, anxiety about Donald Trump and American protectionism is not just a sentiment felt by China, it is one felt by the whole world as well including allied states. Under Donald Trump, the United States has become more unpredictable and more unstable. Likewise, America's liberal-centric media started to demonize and exaggerate every single thing the administration does, which overtly hurts America's soft power. As it did from 2017-2021, this creates an opening for Chinese diplomacy.
While the United States pushes tariffs and trade wars, Beijing again has the opportunity to frame itself as the defender and advocate of the multilateral trading system and globalization. Therefore, China should commit its diplomatic energy to isolating the United States by doubling down on as many free trade and economic agreements as possible, deliberately integrating itself with others, thus pushing back at an American-led agenda for decoupling. This is a diplomatically and economically beneficial strategy that is also necessary to mitigate against what will likely be a brazen agenda by the new administration to establish a new Cold War and thus forcibly divide the world into "blocs."
Chiefs on China's agenda should push forward to join the CPTPP agreement as fast as possible and be prepared to make significant economic and market concessions. There is a window of opportunity to do this, with amicable governments now in place in Tokyo, London, and Canberra. Likewise, if Ottawa has any sense, it should not stand in the way in order to get out of the pit its foreign policy has placed it into. It can hide behind "following" the rest. Out of all of them, establishing a solid détente in relations with Japan should be the priority, with the LDP having been domestically weakened, losing its majority, and its new leader unsure of Trump. The current labor governments in Australia and Britain are also committed to engaging with China. Still, if their Conservative counterparts return to office, they will pursue solid alignment with Washington again. Thus, this window of opportunity has to be seized upon very quickly.
The solution to dealing with Trump is not confrontation but free trade and lots of it. China must shore up its options and contingencies; then it should seek to make a deal with him, enough for him to herald it as a win, marginalize the ultra-hawks, and stabilize US-China relations as a whole!
The author is a well-seasoned writer and analyst with a large portfolio related to China topics, especially in the field of politics, international relations and more. He graduated with an Msc. in Chinese Studies from Oxford University in 2018.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Tom Fowdy:
Opinion | Russian escalation won't come in the form of nukes but in a more subtle yet dangerous way
Opinion | Deep strikes into Russia, a case study of transatlantic sabotage
Opinion | Facing the reality of Marco Rubio as Secretary of State
Comment