By Angelo Giuliano
August 15 marks the anniversary of Japan's defeat and unconditional surrender in 1945. On that day in 2026, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi sent a ritual offering to Yasukuni Shrine. Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, joined by other cabinet members and senior Liberal Democratic Party officials, paid their respects in person. After the visit, Koizumi claimed he was mourning "heroic souls" and renewing a pledge never to engage in war again.
The entire region knows what Yasukuni Shrine represents. It is not a simple place of quiet remembrance. It is the spiritual center and lasting symbol of Japanese militarism. Among the more than two million spirits enshrined there stand the 14 Class-A war criminals. These men planned and directed Japan's wars of aggression across Asia. Their decisions led to invasion, occupation, massacre, and immense suffering for millions of people. Calling them "heroic souls" twists history. Bowing before them and then speaking of peace is pure contradiction.
The empty pledge of peace
How can leaders honor the architects of past aggression and at the same time declare a commitment to peace? The words sound noble, yet the actions tell a different story. Japan continues these visits year after year. Each time the message is the same: the past is not fully confronted. Neighboring countries that lived through the consequences of that militarism see the visits as a refusal to make a clean break with the ideology that once devastated East Asia.
Japan has never issued a full and unambiguous apology that settles the historical record. Statements of regret have appeared over the decades, but they are often carefully worded, later qualified, or undercut by official actions at places like Yasukuni. Without genuine atonement, the pledge not to wage war again rings hollow.
Rearming at full speed
While the peace rhetoric continues, Japan is rapidly expanding its military strength. Defense budgets rise year after year. The country acquires long-range strike missiles, advanced fighter jets, and new warships. Capabilities once considered purely defensive are shifting toward offensive roles. The Self-Defense Forces are being transformed into a more powerful and flexible military instrument.
This expansion does not happen in isolation. Japan is deepening security ties through the trilateral alliance with the United States and South Korea. Agreements such as the Camp David Principles have formalized closer coordination. The three countries hold regular joint military exercises, share intelligence more deeply, and align their postures on regional security. Officials describe this cooperation as essential for deterrence. Critics see it as a framework designed for containment of rising powers in Asia.
A Constitution written by others
The legal foundation for these changes rests on repeated reinterpretations of Japan's postwar constitution. Article 9, which renounces war and the maintenance of war potential, has been stretched far beyond its original wording. Collective self-defense is now permitted. Military roles that once seemed forbidden are treated as acceptable.
Yet this constitution was never purely a Japanese creation. It was largely drafted by American officials during the occupation under General Douglas MacArthur. Presented to Japanese leaders as a near-finished product, it was adopted under the authority of the occupying power. Today, Japanese politicians reinterpret a document written by the United States to unlock greater military freedom. The irony is hard to miss.
A country still under foreign shadow
Japan's limited sovereignty adds another layer to the picture. Since 1945 the country has hosted large numbers of American troops. Major bases, especially in Okinawa, remain under U.S. control. The U.S.-Japan Security Treaty keeps Japan firmly inside the American strategic system. In practical terms, Japan has never operated as a fully independent military power in the postwar era.
Historical records deepen the sense of external influence. According to reporting by the New York Times, the Central Intelligence Agency provided millions of dollars in covert funding to the Liberal Democratic Party during the 1950s and 1960s. The goal was to keep conservative forces in power, block leftist opposition, and ensure Japan remained a reliable partner against communism. The LDP, which has dominated Japanese politics for most of the postwar period, received this support. The party that now leads the push for rearmament and deeper alliances was once sustained by American intelligence money.
The clear pattern
Put the pieces together and the pattern becomes unmistakable. Leaders visit a shrine that honors convicted war criminals. They speak of peace while the military budget climbs and new weapons arrive. They reinterpret a U.S.-drafted constitution to expand military options. They strengthen a trilateral alliance shaped by Washington. They govern a country that still hosts tens of thousands of American troops and whose dominant political party once received CIA funds. And through it all, a complete and lasting apology for wartime aggression remains missing.
The contradiction is not accidental. It is built into the structure of Japan's postwar order. Rituals that elevate militarists sit alongside claims of peaceful intent. Dependence on American power continues even as Japan seeks greater military weight. The language of restraint is used to justify the tools of force.
This is not ancient history. It is present-day policy. When officials bow at Yasukuni and then return to discussions of expanded defense roles and tighter alliances, the message is clear. The past is being managed rather than confronted. The instruments of power are being rebuilt under the same external framework that has shaped Japan for eight decades.
The region watches these developments closely. Countries that experienced Japanese occupation and the full cost of militarism have long memories. Empty pledges and symbolic visits do not erase those memories. Only consistent actions that match words of peace and genuine historical reflection can begin to build trust. Until that happens, the gap between rhetoric and reality will remain wide, obvious, and impossible to ignore.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Angelo Giuliano:
Opinion | The Mecca Alliance: A grand spectacle of empty promises
Opinion | Japan's 2026 defense white paper: Washington's proxy project in the Indo-Pacific
Comment