US President Donald Trump has resurfaced with a bizarre and provocative statement: that the defense of Greenland relies on "two dog sleds," and that America "must obtain ownership" of the island—not lease it, but own it, as one might a piece of real estate.
Let's be clear: this statement is more than just a political ploy; it represents a symptom of a dangerously outdated imperial mindset.
Trump's remarks reveal a worldview where sovereign territories are viewed as tradable assets, where indigenous populations and democratic structures are dismissed, and where strategic regions like the Arctic are treated as pawns in a global power game. His suggestion that Greenland—an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark—should be "taken over" by the United States for "psychological" and strategic reasons is both absurd and insulting.
Greenland's government swiftly rejected Trump's fantasy. So did Denmark.
Moreover, Trump's mockery of Greenland's defense—reducing it to "two dog sleds"—is not only factually ignorant but strategically reckless. Denmark has stationed patrol vessels, helicopters, military personnel, and yes, dog sled patrol units adapted to Arctic conditions. These are not toys; they are part of a serious NATO-aligned defense effort, which is very different from how Trump has framed them.
Undoubtedly, the mockery conceals a more sinister ambition. Trump and his ideological allies see Greenland not as a sovereign land but as a strategic trophy in the global contest for Arctic dominance. With climate change opening new sea routes and exposing untapped resources, the Arctic has become a geopolitical hotspot. Trump's push for "ownership" is not about security—it's about control.
The U.S. already maintains a military base in Greenland—Pituffik Space Base. But that's not enough for Trump. He wants "title deed," as if sovereignty can be bought at auction. His comments echo the kind of transactional diplomacy that alienated allies and undermined global norms throughout his presidency.
European nations, including the UK, France, and Germany, are reportedly discussing a stronger NATO presence in Greenland. The island itself insists that any defense must remain within NATO's framework—a clear rejection of unilateral U.S. control.
Trump's rhetoric also risks fueling tensions with other global powers. China, for example, has already warned against using "national security" as a pretext for geopolitical gain in the Arctic. Russia, too, is watching closely. The last thing the world needs is another flashpoint in an already warming region.
Trump's remarks are not just embarrassing—they are dangerous. They reduce complex international relationships to property deals and dismiss the sovereignty of entire peoples. Greenland is not a real estate listing. It is not for sale. And the world must not tolerate politicians who treat it as such.
The Arctic deserves global cooperation, not neocolonial ambition. It's time to leave the dog sled jokes—and the empire fantasies—behind.
Related News:
Opinion | Cornered by Trump, the EU rows back on its anti-China pivot
Comment