By Felicia LI
On October 20th, excavators tore into the East Wing of the White House. Dust rose, walls crumbled, and a $250 million project began: the construction of US President Donald Trump's new luxury ballroom, a 90,000-square-foot monument to grandeur, expected to host up to 999 guests.
But just blocks away from the symbolic heart of American power, the country was in crisis. The U.S. government had been shut down for 22 days, leaving hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed without pay. Over $11 billion in public infrastructure and welfare projects were frozen, including clean water systems in New York and parks in San Francisco. The juxtaposition is stark: a gold-plated hall for the elite rises while the foundations of everyday life crumble.
In 2019, during a previous shutdown, Trump famously served McDonald's and pizza to a visiting football team, citing that White House chefs were on unpaid leave. Now, in 2025, he is overseeing the construction of an opulent ballroom—during yet another shutdown. His justification? The current tents used for state dinners are "ugly" and "cramped."
Yet no president in history has demolished core structures of the White House to make room for gala halls. The existing State Dining Room holds 140 guests—enough for nearly all official engagements. This leap from fast food to golden domes is not merely architectural—it's philosophical. It reflects a presidency more concerned with image than governance, more invested in legacy than livelihood.
Who's Really Paying?
According to BBC reporting, only one donor has been publicly named: YouTube, which is contributing $22 million as part of a private settlement over Trump's banned account following the January 6 riot. The rest of the funding? A mystery.
At a dinner for potential donors on October 15, top executives from Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Palantir, Blackstone, Coinbase, and OpenAI were present. Also in attendance: NFL team owners and billionaires. Pledge forms reportedly offered "recognition" to contributors—possibly in the form of their names etched into the structure. Some asked if $25 million would be a sufficient donation. Trump's reply? "I'll take it."
Critics have called it what it appears to be: a pay-to-play scheme, where access to the presidency is literally bought and engraved in stone.
Meanwhile, the government shutdown continues to devastate working families:
- Shortages in air traffic control have led to massive flight delays.
- Food assistance for low-income households is at risk.
- Infrastructure projects in Democrat-led states are frozen.
This selective sacrifice reveals a chilling logic: military budgets and symbolic power projects remain untouched, while social programs are being used as political bargaining chips.
As Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer remarked, this administration is "taking away from the people and handing it to those already in power—starting with Donald Trump himself."
Historically, White House renovations—like Monroe's portico or Roosevelt's dining room—were made to support government function. Trump's ballroom? It's being fast-tracked during a shutdown, funded by private donors, and designed for private prestige.
A government unable to pay its workers is somehow able to build a $250 million ballroom. A state that withholds healthcare from the vulnerable hides the identities of those financing its golden chamber. The timing and scale point to one conclusion: in a partially paralyzed republic, the empire's stage must be grander than ever.
Democracy or Donorcracy?
The ballroom is more than a structure. It's a symbol of the growing fusion between capital and executive power. When billionaires can buy their way into the White House—literally—what is left of democratic equality?
Former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter cautioned that this situation presents a significant ethical dilemma. Perhaps more than that, it's a constitutional reckoning. The White House, once a beacon of public seservice, now risks transforming into a palace of private interests.
A new ballroom will rise in Washington, its golden dome gleaming in the sun. But below it lie the fractured foundations of a democracy increasingly shaped by wealth, not will.
The true cost of this ballroom is not $250 million. It's the erosion of public trust, the commodification of civic space, and the normalization of "pay-to-govern" politics.
The American people deserve more than marble floors and chandeliers.
They deserve a government that works—for them, not just for those who can write the biggest check.
Related News:
Trump criticized for proceeding with US$250 mn White House ballroom project amid govt shutdown
Comment