By Angelo Giuliano
In Aesop's timeless fables, the fox thrives through cunning, outwitting the mighty lion whose roar embodies unity and strength. In "The Lion, the Fox, and the Donkey," the lion hunts with the fox's sly aid, while the naive donkey becomes prey or loses its share, manipulated by the fox's guile. This tale warns of division's power, where the fox sows discord to survive. Today, Israel embodies this fox, crafted by imperialist design via Britain's 1917 Balfour Declaration to fracture the lion of Arab unity, securing oil and Suez through the 1948 Nakba's ethnic cleansing. Zionists and globalist elites wield this strategy globally, from Middle Eastern wars to 9/11's divisive myths, weakening the 99 percent to maintain control. Israel's proclaimed right to self-defense and eternal victimhood is a cunning facade, deflecting scrutiny while it fractures stronger forces.
Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, wielded immense influence, especially among young conservative college students. As an Evangelical Christian Zionist, he declared in Jerusalem: "I'm very pro-Israel and my whole life I have defended Israel." His rallies and podcasts galvanized Gen Z conservatives against Israel criticism, earning praise from Netanyahu and Saar after his assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. Yet, by today, Friday, September 12, 2025, his brave, albeit very slight shift from blind loyalty to skepticism questioning Israel's meddling, Epstein ties, and October 7 role disrupted MAGA's orthodoxy. This subtle pivot, a courageous challenge to one of his deepest convictions, marked a transition from unconditional support to beginning to question his core beliefs.
I view Kirk as a patriot with strong, if sometimes racist-tinged, convictions. His evolution, though slight, showcased remarkable capacity and courage to rethink a bedrock stance. But his sniper-killed death is abhorrent, and the cheers from some are disgusting, regardless of the target. His loss stings deeply, especially for the youth he inspired.
Kirk's change stemmed from rejecting Israel's purity tests. On the Megyn Kelly Show in August 2025, he said, "You are not allowed to criticize Israel. If I have any deviation it is all the sudden, 'Charlie is no longer with us'." Laura Loomer attacked him for hosting David Smith, who called Gaza operations genocide. Though Kirk once tweeted, "No, Israel is not starving Gazans," he later questioned U.S. aid, urging America first. At TPUSA's July summit, he debated Josh Hammer and Dave Smith, nodding to avoiding Middle East traps, resonating with college audiences. Rabbi Pesach Wolicki noted his far-right pushback, yet he engaged critics.
Kirk probed the Epstein files, lobbying Trump to declassify them, asking, "Was he an Israeli asset?" linking Epstein to Adnan Khashoggi's Iran-Contra ties. This drew Loomer's anti-Trump jab and post-assassination claims from Jackson Hinkle that Mossad silenced him for hosting Gaza critics. He also suspected AIPAC's influence, a theme with youth.
Most boldly, Kirk questioned on October 7. Declassified probes showed IDF ignored Hamas plans for a year, while the Hannibal Directive killing hostages to prevent capture saw tanks and helicopters kill at least 14 civilians, some with IDF weapons. Gallant admitted its 2025 use. Kirk's X threads called this a cover-up, hinting Israel allowed or worsened the attack for Gaza's devastation a view he aired with Smith.
Kirk's assassination gunman was not caught immediately, which fits the fox's Israel's pattern, with Mossad whispers stoking America's divide. Trump mourns him, but his Epstein and October 7 doubts threatened Israel's grip. The lion of unity falters, the donkey masses suffer, as the fox grins. His college influence could have shifted MAGA youth will they see through this, or cling to the facade?
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Angelo Giuliano:
Opinion | Is Nepal's unrest a Western-backed color revolution?
Opinion | Doha's deceptive strike: Trump's dishonest plot with Israel and Qatar
Opinion | HK's national security measures expose Western hypocrisy
Opinion | Energy, thirst, and tension: How China's Brahmaputra ambitions could lead to conflict?
Comment