The latest issue of TIME magazine features a blood-red cover with a single bold word: "Enough."
Despite the frequent occurrence of mass shootings over the years, the broad-daylight assassination of conservative political figure Charlie Kirk has still sent shockwaves through American society. The word "Enough" on the cover of TIME reflects the sentiments of some Americans, but the pressing question remains: Has America truly had "enough" of its extreme polarization and political violence? Or will even more extreme incidents unfold in the future? And what lessons might Hong Kong draw from this?
On Sept. 12, local time, the suspect accused of killing Kirk was officially arrested. Surprisingly, the shooter turned out to be from a pro-MAGA (Make America Great Again) conservative family. The 22-year-old, Tyler Robinson, described by his classmates and friends as "quiet" and an academic high-achiever, chose not to excel in school but instead took to a university rooftop, where he fired at Kirk simply because he disagreed with his views.
This incident underscores the alarming extent of societal division and the normalization of political violence in America, which has far exceeded what many had previously imagined.
In the past, America's divisions were largely confined to the partisan rivalry between Democrats and Republicans. But now, it appears that even within the same political camp, hatred rivaling that reserved for the opposition is festering. What's more frightening, according to US media reports, is that Robinson's sole motivation was his dislike of Kirk and his opinions—a seemingly trivial issue that could be found in any society, yet one that led Robinson to commit murder. From the attempted assassination of Donald Trump during his campaign to the two Minnesota state lawmakers attacked just months ago, Robinson is far from an isolated case.
The long-standing operation of American democracy has failed to achieve the lofty ideals outlined in the US Constitution: "to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." Instead, it has produced countless known and unknown "shooters," a phenomenon that would have been unimaginable to the nation's founding fathers, such as George Washington.
American democracy: A global cautionary tale
The blood-red cover of TIME magazine reflects the growing frustration among Americans with the status quo, but objective reality does not bend to individual will. Following Robinson's arrest, tensions between America's left and right factions have only deepened. Left-wing supporters celebrated Kirk's death and mocked the shooter's conservative family background, while right-wing supporters claimed the incident was orchestrated by the extreme left. For example, Donald Trump has yet to retract his calls for a crackdown on radical leftists in response to the event. Meanwhile, Kirk, a polarizing figure in life, has now been elevated by conservatives to the status of a "martyr," serving as a rallying symbol to strengthen political cohesion.
Rather than prompting societal reflection on the horrors of violence, Kirk's death has further intensified the confrontations between opposing political ideologies.
Although TIME characterizes Kirk's death as a result of the spread of political violence, the reality may be the reverse: his death could also serve as a catalyst for its continued escalation.
The chaos in America today is, to a certain extent, the consequence of its politicians' own actions. When George Floyd, a criminal with a history of violent offenses, was hailed as a "hero," when Trump incited supporters to storm the Capitol, using his presidential powers to issue pardons, and when former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi referred to the riots in HK as a "beautiful sight," US politicians repeatedly sent the message that "political violence works" to society. Over time, the moral restraints on people have gradually eroded, and the norms of modern civilization are regressing to a state of jungle law, where the strong prey on the weak. Dialogue and tolerance are increasingly giving way to violence and murder.
Although HK may seem far removed from these events, one cannot help but recall the illegal 2014 "Occupy Central" protests and the 2019 turmoil. Wasn't HK once teetering on the edge of the same precipice?
No today's HK without stopping violence and chaos
Reality offers no "what ifs," but it's hard not to imagine: What if, during the height of the HK riots, the central government hadn't acted promptly to enact the National Security Law for HK? What if the region's electoral system hadn't been improved? What if the principle of "patriots governing HK" hadn't been upheld? What if anti-China disruptors hadn't been held accountable and punished under the law? What would HK look like today?
Kirk's death serves as a chilling reminder of the outcome of such "what ifs." When violence and the so-called "achieving justice through lawbreaking" are not condemned but instead seen as solutions, society becomes a place where everyone lives in fear, and basic trust between people erodes. When division and over-politicization are allowed to fester unchecked, society loses the focus necessary for development, and legislative bodies become consumed by partisan battles, with no one left to care about serving the public good.
Indeed, HK was once on the brink of falling into a spiral of violence. Rioters smashed, burned, and vandalized; citizens with opposing views were "settled privately" in violent beatings; the protestors plotted indiscriminate bombings and even assassination attempts against police officers. Without the subsequent efforts to restore order, HK could not have achieved the level of development it enjoys today, where even the basic safety of its residents would be in doubt.
Without the decisive measures to stop violence and chaos, HK could never have achieved its best-ever position in the 2025 World Talent Ranking, claiming the top spot in Asia. It would not have been able to successfully host the "Belt and Road Summit," drawing thousands of influential global political and business leaders. Comparing this to the dehumanization and normalization of violence in US politics, it becomes clear how precious and hard-won HK's current progress truly is. This progress is not the result of luck or coincidence but of years of concerted efforts by the central government, the HK Special Administrative Region government, and all sectors of society. Every HK citizen should cherish and work to maintain this success.
Countless signs suggest that this shooting in the US will not be the last, and Charlie Kirk will not be the final victim. In the foreseeable future, America's political environment will only grow more extreme, and societal divisions will deepen. As many scholars have pointed out, today's America is already on the "brink of a civil war." The blood-red cover of TIME may have been intended as a warning, but in hindsight, it might also serve as a prophecy of America's future.
(Source: Ta Kung Pao; Journalist: Mei Ruolin; English Editor: Zoey SUN)
Related News:
Student who questioned Kirk targeted by right-wingers: Forced to clarify his position
Watch This | MAGA influencer shot dead: Trump orders flags at half-mast
Comment