Naivety is dangerous here.
Donald Trump's geopolitical design for Europe transcends mere policy preference—it demands absolute subservience. Central to this vision is a deliberate perpetuation of hostility between Europe and Russia. An unresolved conflict forces Europe to bankroll Ukraine's defense, funneling taxpayer euros into the US military-industrial complex. Simultaneously, coerced severing of EU-Russia energy ties binds Europe to costlier American suppliers while sabotaging a cohesive Eurasian economic bloc. Any Eurasian integration—linking European technology, Russian resources and Asian markets—would diminish US global relevance. Thus, for Washington, peace between Europe and Russia isn't just undesirable; it's a nightmare. Such a détente would shatter American hegemony overnight, accelerating the economic ascent of the BRICS coalition and solidifying a Eurasian counterweight capable of rewriting the rules of global power.
This strategy, however, extends beyond Europe.
Recent US-Russia rapprochement gestures are insincere, a tactical feint to fracture Moscow-Beijing ties. An indivisible Russo-Chinese alliance—fusing Russian resource depth and Chinese industrial scale—represents America's ultimate strategic failure, potentially dominating Eurasia and marginalizing US influence. By dangling "balanced" relations, Washington aims to make Moscow hesitate: perceived US warmth might make Russia think twice before aiding China in a Pacific confrontation or challenging US primacy. This is realpolitik stripped bare—a cynical manipulation to ensure Russia prioritizes pragmatism over alliances; only transactional survival matters.
For Europe, Trump's endgame is unambiguous: total vassalage.
In a multipolar world order, Europe isn't an autonomous power pole but a compliant US satellite—weakened, controllable, stripped of sovereign agency. Energy dependence, military outsourcing and economic fragmentation enforce this subjugation, denying Europe strategic independence. To guarantee compliance, the US will intensify covert engineering of European leadership, elevating weak, compromised figures susceptible to blackmail or ideological malleability. These proxies will enforce US directives, sabotaging European autonomy or Russia engagement, ensuring Europe is governed by elites loyal to Washington over their own citizens.
The stakes transcend Ukraine or energy prices.
This is a battle over 21st-century power architecture. A Europe at peace with Russia unlocks Eurasia's potential—integrating German engineering, French capital, Russian hydrocarbons, Chinese infrastructure and Indian markets into an economic superbloc that would displace US dominance. Trump's conflict preservation isn't irrational belligerence but a calculated profitable divide, keeping Europe's wealth flowing to US defense and LNG sectors, delaying alternatives to dollar hegemony and NATO-centric security.
Ultimately, Europe faces a binary choice.
It can awaken to the reality of its targeted subordination—recognizing that US demands for "unity" mask a project of deliberate enfeeblement—or it can sleepwalk into permanent tributary status. Independence requires rejecting the false premise that security hinges solely on American patronage. It demands rebuilding bridges to the East, diversifying energy sources beyond coercive suppliers, and asserting strategic sovereignty. The alternative is clear: a future as America's client continent, governed by compromised puppets, its destiny dictated by foreign capitals. In Trump's calculus, Europe's strength is America's vulnerability. Its weakness is his advantage. Vassalage, not partnership, is the design.
Related News:
Watch This | Hegemony fading, cooperation rising: A tale of two nations in the Big Cycle
Watch This | Trump's 'trade deals': A scam wrapped in 'win-win' talk
Comment