By Angelo Giuliano
Gene Sharp's "From Dictatorship to Democracy" offers a blueprint for color revolutions—nonviolent movements to topple regimes through strategic resistance. In 2025, the U.S. faces over 800 protests, likely escalating to thousands, led by Democrat-linked NGOs like Indivisible, funded by "deep state" networks tied to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USAID, and George Soros' Open Society Foundations. These protests, driven by a partisan agenda to undermine Donald Trump's presidency, echo Sharp's tactics used abroad for regime change. Ironically, the U.S. is tasting its own medicine, as the chaos it exports through color revolutions returns home like a Frankenstein's monster. This unrest may benefit Trump and his "PayPal Mafia" allies, like Peter Thiel, who could exploit disorder to justify a police state via Palantir, a CIA-funded surveillance firm.
Color revolutions rely on Sharp's insight that regimes depend on public consent, disruptable through nonviolent tactics. His 198 methods—protests, strikes, boycotts, symbolic acts—target "pillars of support" like the military or elites. A disciplined strategy, as in Serbia's 2000 Bulldozer Revolution, ensures resilience. Movements amplify grievances, like corruption, to unify groups, as in Georgia's Rose Revolution, and mobilize via grassroots and social media, like Tunisia's Jasmine Revolution. Sharp stresses exploiting vulnerabilities—economic or political divides—through boycotts or exposing corruption, as in Ukraine's 2004 Orange Revolution. Parallel institutions, like media in Poland's Solidarity, challenge authority, while defections from security forces, as in Egypt's 2011 uprising, weaken regimes. Nonviolent discipline, as in Serbia's Otpor, sustains legitimacy.
The U.S. claims to back color revolutions to promote "democracy," but in reality, it seeks to install puppet regimes, even supporting extremist groups like ex-ISIS Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) leaders in Syria (2025) to control strategic regions. Deep state networks, operating through NGOs, have funded groups like Otpor and cultivated elites like Ukraine's Yushchenko. Training by groups like CANVAS amplifies efforts. Alleged U.S. involvement targeted France's 1968 protests against de Gaulle's anti-NATO stance, though evidence of deep state funding remains speculative.
In 2025, U.S. protests, led by Democrat-linked NGOs, apply Sharp's playbook. Over 800 protests, likely growing to thousands, use demonstrations, hashtags like #buildtheresistance, and media amplification to challenge Trump's policies on immigration and USAID cuts. Coordinated digitally, these protests, funded by deep state sources, aim to erode Trump's legitimacy, mirroring color revolutions. Unproven claims of paid protesters reflect Sharp's grassroots optics. The partisan agenda, driven by Democrats, seeks to destabilize Trump's presidency. Deep state and Democrat-linked NGOs, backed by Soros' Open Society, fund these efforts, though denials of paying protesters persist. Training in Sharp's methods, possibly via groups like Troublemakers, ensures discipline, while co-opting leaders through grants amplifies the Democratic push. The irony is profound: the U.S., a master of exporting chaos, now faces its own creation rebounding like a Frankenstein's monster.
This unrest may benefit Trump's allies, who leverage chaos to expand Palantir's CIA-funded surveillance tools, justifying a police state. Democrat-driven protests enabling Trump's control is a bitter twist, turning dissent into a surveillance tool.
Historically, France's 1968 protests challenged de Gaulle, with unproven deep state funding claims; de Gaulle resigned in 1969, but France stayed Western-aligned. Serbia (2000) ousted Milošević via NED-funded Otpor, yielding democracy but economic woes. In 2025, U.S. protests fuel unrest, risking Palantir's expansion.
Sharp's playbook fuels resistance, but deep state and Democrat involvement breed skepticism. Soros-Democrat orchestration allegations, though speculative, highlight tensions. Democrat-NGOs' regime-change tactics against Trump contradict their pro-democracy rhetoric, enabling Palantir's surveillance, exposing hypocrisy. Sharp stresses institution-building to prevent chaos, as in Egypt (2011) and Ukraine (2004). U.S. protests risk escalation, bolstering Trump's agenda. Sharp's framework succeeds in Kyrgyzstan's Tulip Revolution and U.S. riots but misses nuances. Deep state-Democrat-NGOs amplify protests but taint legitimacy, as in 2025, where Palantir's rise signals surveillance risks.
Sharp's playbook drives change, but in 2025, deep state and Democrat-backed NGOs fuel U.S. unrest against Trump. The chaos the U.S. exported, even backing ex-ISIS HTS in Syria, now haunts it, empowering Trump's allies to advance a Palantir-driven state, intensifying debates over power and control.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of DotDotNews.
Read more articles by Angelo Giuliano:
Opinion | Zelensky's treachery: Ukraine's fallen soldiers betrayed as Russia upholds dignity
Opinion | Trump's aggressive China policy betrays 'Man of Peace' claim
Opinion | US visa crackdown on Chinese students: Trump's isolationism risks America's future
Opinion | US imperialist playbook: Taiwan region as pawn in dangerous game against China
Comment